DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 $. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
EGA ;
Docket No: 13250-14
12 March 2015
Dear Sa
This. is in reference to your reconsideration request dated 4
Decembér 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were
advised in our letter of 10 February 2011, that your application
had been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application and any material
submitted in support of your application.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the assertion you submitted,
even though not previously considered by the Board, was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable.material
error or injustice. The Board determined that your post service
medical treatment for bipolar disorder was not enough to -
outweigh the significant misconduct you committed while on
active duty. Accordingly; your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an’official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5680 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the medical notes you submitted, © even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3162 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the psychological evaluation notes you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2577 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11934 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8524 14_Redacted
your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the letter you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board, was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7528 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 22 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5598 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and your previous case file. Consequently, when _applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8072 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the medical evidence that you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8231 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11072 14
been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 4 February 2015. in your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.